Default meanings: language’s logical connectives between comprehension and reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Language employs various coordinators to connect propositions, a subset of which are “logical” in nature and thus analogous the truth operators formal logic. We here focus on two linguistic connectives their negations: conjunction (inclusive) disjunction or . Linguistic exhibit truth-conditional component as part meaning (their semantics), but use context can give rise implicatures presuppositions (the domain pragmatics) well inferences that go beyond semantic/pragmatic properties result reasoning processes). provide comprehensive review role logical language argue three sets factors—semantic, pragmatic, those related reasoning—are separate separable, though some details may differ cross-linguistically. As way showcase argument, we present experiments comprehension Spanish wherein pragmatic content was minimised processes neutered, potentially highlighting what might be default meanings under study. In Experiment 1 show conjunctive reading inclusive is available positive contexts other than syntactically intricate cases such downward entailing free choice contexts, contrary has been claimed literature. 2 negated conjunctions disjunctions easily receive same interpretation when contrasted against and, moreover, these interpretations match English, despite claims from literature local negation interact differently English Romance languages.
منابع مشابه
A Logical Framework for Default Reasoning
This paper presents a simple logical framework for default reasoning. The semantics is normal first order model theory; instead of changing the logic, the way in which the logic is used is changed. Rather than expecting reasoning to be just deduction (in any logic) from our knowledge, we examine the consequences of viewing reasoning as a very simple case of theory formation. By treating default...
متن کاملReasoning from connectives and relations between entities
This article reports investigations of inferences that depend both on connectives between clauses, such as or else, and on relations between entities, such as in the same place as. Participants made more valid inferences from biconditionals--for instance, Ann is taller than Beth if and only if Beth is taller than Cath--than from exclusive disjunctions (Exp. 1). They made more valid transitive i...
متن کاملMental representation of logical connectives.
Logical connectives, such as "AND", "OR", "IF. THEN", and "IF AND ONLY IF" are ubiquitous in both language and cognition; however, reasoning with logical connectives is error-prone. We argue that some of these errors may stem from people's tendency to minimize the number of possibilities compatible with logical connectives and to construct a "minimalist" one-possibility representation. As a res...
متن کاملHow logical reasoning mediates the relation between lexical quality and reading comprehension.
The present study aimed to examine the role of logical reasoning in the relation between lexical quality and reading comprehension in 146 fourth grade Dutch children. We assessed their standardized reading comprehension measure, along with their decoding efficiency and vocabulary as measures of lexical quality, syllogistic reasoning as measure of (verbal) logical reasoning, and nonverbal reason...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Linguistics and Philosophy
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0165-0157', '1573-0549']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-022-09359-w